- Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Hawaii.
Visual discrimination of relative distance by a bottlenosed dolphin
(Tursiops truncatus)Evidence for relation learning
- James R. Mobley
University of Hawaii, Kewalo Basin Marine Mammal Lboratory, 1129
Ala Moana Blvd., Honolulu, HI, USA, 96814
-
- (C) 1984 University of Hawaii
A series of seven experiments examining visual discrimination
capabilities of a bottlenosed dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) were
performed at Sea Life Park, Makapuu, Oahu during the period January,
1982 through May, 1983. The object of all the visual discrimination
experiments described here was to discriminate the nearer of two
visual targets presented in air. In Experiment 1, the distance
between the pair of targets (rectangular cards) was varied with
each inter-target distance appearing equally and in random order,
as per the method of constant stimuli. Results showed performance
to be under stimulus control of the amount of separation between
the targets in depth. Further a depth acuity estimate of 16.2
min of visual arc was deriveda value comparable to estimates
of monocular depth acuity of other animals shown to possess steropsis.
Experiment 2 revealed performance levels to remain high (i.e.,
above 90% correct) for targets equated for retinal size differences
at their respective viwing distances, thus suggesting that the
relative size of the retinal images was not the crucial cue mediating
discrimination of the nearer target.
Conceptual transfer of the relational rule (i.e., go to
the nearer target) was demonstrated by generalization from
the previous two-dimensional class of targets (rectangular cards)
to a novel three-dimensional class (styrofoam balls) in Experiment
3, and across a series of 24 identical pairs and 16 dissimilar
pairs of two- and three-dimensional targets in Experiments 4 and
5, respectively. Such evidence of learning transfer has been wholly
absent from previous experiments involving in-air discrimination
using static visual targets. Experiment 4 also demonstrated some
perceptual constraints in making judgements of relative distance
in that objects subtending less than 3&Mac176; of visual arc as
well as vertical linear targets (wooden dowels) resulted in subthreshold
performance levels. In Experiment 6, the stimulus configuration
was altered through a series of rotations from horizontal to vertical
alignment of the visual targets. Performance remained above criterion
of 80% correct for all four rotation positions used (0&Mac176;,
30&Mac176;, 60&Mac176;, and 90&Mac176;). These results contain
further significance in that at 90&Mac176; rotation, the stimuli
were equidistant from the response manipulanda, thereby requiring
mediation of the conditional rule, if nearer target on top,
go right; if nearer target on bottom, go left; thus further
demonstrating a higher-order of learning flexibility than is normally
characteristic of visual-based tasks using bottlenosed dolphins.
Based on features of the visual display apparatus as well as consideration
of anatomical details of the animal in question, the cueing dimensions
mediating the task (in the absence of size cues) were thought
to be differential motion parallax, accomodation cues (differential
blur), or differential brightness cues. In further
efforts towards cue reduction, the relative importance of motion
parallax cues was tested in Experiment 7 through comparison of
stationary viewing (via bite-bar apparatus) versus free-viewing
discrimination performance. Results indicated superior free-viewing
performance (though statistically non-significant) which suggested
the additional depth-resolving power of motion parallax. Examination
of one informal videotaped session, however, revealed more than
half of the fixed-viewing trials to be contaminated
by movement of the subject. Thus, motion parallax cues may have
been present throughout the fixed-viewing condition.
Overall, these results, in conjunction with reviewed literature,
strongly suggest the bottlenosed dolphin to be relatively more
prepared to extract relative distance information
from features of the environment than visual form information.
It was suggested that visual estimations of short-range distances
may be of biological importance to this species, perhaps complementing
the directional limitations of the biosonar when closing in on
elusive prey.
- Mobley, J. R. (1984). Visual discrimination of relative distance
by a bottlenosed dolphin (Tursiops truncatus)--Evidence
for relation learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University
of Hawaii. Honolulu.
Back to Top
Dolphin
Programs | Whale
Programs | Education
Programs | Our Research
| Resource Guide
Copyright © 2002, The Dolphin Institute
|